From the
Bucktail Rifles
The unexpected and unsought for reception which was tendered to me by thepatriotic citizens of Mauch Chunk fills my heart with pride and emotions
which will explain themselves in the forthcoming great struggle, and in no way will I be better able to repay them for the interest which they take in
my behalf thereby showing them and proving that little Carbon is well represented in the Bucktail Regiment, and my only prayer would be that
me by the patriotic citizens of
to my country and only proved in reality what I have promised to them. When the welcome news was received last spring from our Governor that my company
was accepted, and when I parted from Mauch Chunk, all my aim has been to prove myself worthy of their confidence and let no stain of dishonor mark
the footsteps of my company, and thank God so far I can say without compunction that the company has been no dishonor to little Carbon, nor its
benefactors.I herewith tender my sincerest thanks to the Union loving patriots of Mauch Chunk and especially the below named gentlemen for the kind reception and entertainment they gave me on my short leave of absence:
Dr. Shoemaker Nathan Barney
M. M. Dimmick
C. Albright ______ Ely
Charles L. White James Belford
D. Kalbfus _____ Swartz
E. T. Foster John Painter
A. Roberson J. Smith
James K. Polk Lieut. John Brelsford
J. B. McCreary William H. Stroh
R. Q. Butler John Dolan
S. L. Kellam Charles Packer, Esquire
and many others.
Hoping soon to be able to give your readers a description of a glorious
battle,
I am, respectfully Yours,
Dennis McGee
******************************************************************
Note on the writer:
Dennis McGee served as a Captain in
mustered in on
reinstated, resigning in 1865. It is likely he was the same Dennis McGee
living in Mauch Chunk working as a grocer, with a wife and son, in 1850.
*********************************
Other notes:
1. In McGees letter, he identified one of the citizens of Mauch Chunk
as Lieut. John Belford. This has been corrected above.
2. There was an apparent typo concerning the date of the letter as
printed in the paper. It had the date as 1861, this has been corrected.